Table 2. Number of T-DNA copies in 26 transgenic apple lines. |
Line |
Detected T-DNA fragments |
Copy |
Loci |
Presence of truncated T-DNA’s and |
|||
HindIII |
XbaI |
||||||
nptII |
attE |
nptII |
attE |
||||
T311 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
truncated copies3, |
T315 |
8 |
2 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
truncated copies2, 3 |
T316 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
T320 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
T321 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
T322 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
T324 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
truncated copies2 |
T328 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
truncated copies3 |
T329 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
truncated copies3 |
T333 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
truncated copies3, |
T334 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
transgene repeat |
T335 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
truncated copies3, |
T336 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
truncated copies3 |
T338 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
T340 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
truncated copies3 |
T344 |
1 |
1 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
11 |
11 |
|
T345 |
2 |
2 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
21 |
21 |
truncated copies2 |
T347 |
1 |
2 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
21 |
21 |
truncated copies2 |
T349 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
T353 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
truncated copies2, |
T355 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
truncated copies2 |
T357 |
1 |
1 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
11 |
11 |
|
T358 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
truncated copies3 |
T359 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
? |
1 |
transgene repeat |
T360 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
? |
1 |
transgene repeat |
T361 |
1 |
1 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
11 |
11 |
|
Pinova6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1Results are based on one Southern
experiment - the number of copies is possibly higher. |
|