Table 1. Experimental values (training, testing and validation data), actual and model predicated of isolated yield on the enzymatic reaction. |
Run No. |
Time |
Temperature |
Amount of |
Molar ratio1 |
Isolated Yield (%) |
|
Actual |
predicted |
|||||
Training Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
50 |
150 |
0.6 |
33.3 |
33.28 |
2 |
24 |
50 |
150 |
0.6 |
58.8 |
58.85 |
3 |
16 |
40 |
150 |
0.6 |
31.1 |
31.11 |
4 |
16 |
50 |
50 |
0.6 |
39.8 |
39.78 |
5 |
16 |
50 |
250 |
0.6 |
43.1 |
43.15 |
6 |
16 |
50 |
150 |
0.2 |
29.5 |
29.51 |
7 |
12 |
45 |
100 |
0.4 |
20.2 |
20.24 |
8 |
20 |
45 |
100 |
0.4 |
36.5 |
36.49 |
9 |
20 |
55 |
100 |
0.4 |
47.4 |
47.39 |
10 |
12 |
45 |
200 |
0.4 |
27.6 |
27.57 |
11 |
20 |
45 |
200 |
0.4 |
43.2 |
43.15 |
12 |
12 |
45 |
100 |
0.8 |
35.6 |
35.58 |
13 |
20 |
45 |
100 |
0.8 |
49.1 |
49.11 |
14 |
12 |
55 |
100 |
0.8 |
55.2 |
55.22 |
15 |
12 |
45 |
200 |
0.8 |
40.8 |
40.81 |
16 |
20 |
45 |
200 |
0.8 |
58.6 |
58.54 |
17 |
12 |
55 |
200 |
0.8 |
52.5 |
52.44 |
18 |
20 |
55 |
100 |
0.8 |
62.7 |
62.64 |
19 |
16 |
60 |
150 |
0.6 |
53.3 |
53.3 |
20 |
16 |
50 |
150 |
1.0 |
58.9 |
58.94 |
21 |
16 |
50 |
150 |
0.6 |
54.7 |
54.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
20 |
55 |
200 |
0.4 |
46.4 |
46.69 |
23 |
12 |
55 |
100 |
0.4 |
36.2 |
35.32 |
24 |
12 |
55 |
200 |
0.4 |
35.4 |
36.2 |
25 |
20 |
55 |
200 |
0.8 |
60.4 |
60.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validation Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
24 |
45 |
176 |
1.0 |
57.5 |
58.11 |
27 |
24 |
50 |
176 |
1.0 |
60.5 |
60.23 |
28 |
24 |
55 |
176 |
1.0 |
61.8 |
61.34 |
29 |
24 |
60 |
176 |
1.0 |
57.3 |
58.12 |
30 |
20 |
53 |
148 |
0.8 |
64.3 |
64.91 |
31 |
20 |
54 |
145 |
0.9 |
64.7 |
65.65 |
1Molar ratio = mmol betulinic acid/mmol phthalic anhydride |
|