Figure 6. Constitutive PStSN1 activity Arabidopsis lines after phytohormones, light, UV radiation or Pseudomonas syringae infection. Independent transgenic Arabidopsis lines harboring PStSN1::GUS constructs (Lines 2B, 5C, 8B and 11A) and a 35S::GUS transgenic line were evaluated upon different treatments. GUS activity was measured and percentages were calculated relative to untreated control data. The data represent the average percentage of GUS activity ± SE measured in eight (a and b) or ten biological replicates (d).
(a) Phytohormones Treatments. Whole plants were sprayed with abscisic acid (ABA), indol acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid, (GA3) or mock-treated with water and collected al 6 h to evaluate GUS activity.
(b) Light Treatment. Plants grown under 10 hrs dark-14 hrs light cycle, were covered and kept in darkness or left to continue the normal light cycle for 4 h prior to collection.
(c) UV radiation Treatment. Fifty 14-days-old seedlings of each PStSN1::GUS line were collected 2 hrs after exposure to a UV light bulb and pooled (Errors bars correspond to three techniques replicates).
(d) Pseudomonas syringae infection. Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae suspensions (Infected) or 10 mM MgSO4 (Control) were sprayed on intact leaves and whole plants were collected at 72 hrs post infection.
(e) Treatment effectiveness was assayed by RT-PCR of different inducible genes: ABA-inducible RD22 (NM_122472); IAA-inducible SAURAC1 (S70188), GA3-inducible APT1 (NM_179383) and light-inducible CHS gene (NM_121396). Specific Actin-2 (NM_112764) transcript amplification was detected in all plants as an internal control of cDNA synthesis (lower panel of each treatment). M: Molecular Marker 1 Kb; (-) Negative PCR control (without DNA).


Supported by UNESCO / MIRCEN network