Table
5. Course activities graded by the internal and external evaluators
and diplomatic personnel. |
Grades of Evaluation |
||
Item 1.Program outline, implementation and Process* |
Internal |
External |
Application and selection methods |
||
1. Method of application 2. Method of selection |
A A |
A6** A3; B3 |
Program outline |
||
1. Content of Program (inclusive of Lectures) |
B |
A4; B2 |
2. Laboratory Experiments |
A |
A5; B1 |
3.
Study |
A |
A5; B1 |
4. Research Training |
A |
A6 |
5. Research presentations |
A |
A5; B1 |
6. Accommodation |
B |
A1; B 4;C1 |
Item 2. Trainee performance and career potential of graduates*** |
||
1. Activity of graduates in their home countries |
A |
A5; B1 |
2. Graduates in international collaboration |
A |
A6 |
3. Overall Evaluation of the courses |
||
a) Course requirement |
A |
A6 |
b) Course effectiveness |
A |
A5; B1 |
c) Course usefulness |
A |
A6 |
Overview Evaluation |
|
|
Overview
Evaluationby diplomats in |
A |
A6
|
*A: more than sufficient contribution for the purpose; B= good; C=average; D=low; E=none. **Figure indicates the number of views expressed. ***A: More than sufficient activity by graduates; B=good; C =average; D=low; E=none. |
|