Table 2. Densitometric analysis of the hybridization signals in Figure 1 (Mean ± SEM, n = 3 each). |
Clone |
Mean density in Fa |
Mean density in Tb |
Relative intensityc |
SSH407 |
0.77 ± 0.08 |
2.32 ± 0.23* |
3.0 |
SSH424 |
1.51 ± 0.15 |
2.22 ± 0.02* |
1.5 |
SSH425 |
1.15 ± 0.13 |
2.15 ± 0.21* |
1.9 |
SSH427 |
0.89 ± 0.27 |
1.65 ± 0.24* |
1.9 |
SSH454 |
0.98 ± 0.05 |
1.39 ± 0.16 |
1.4 |
SSH466 |
0 |
0.96 ± 0.11 |
|
SSH486 |
0.51 ± 0.12 |
2.14 ± 0.13* |
4.2 |
SSH528 |
0.93 ± 0.04 |
1.20 ± 0.11* |
1.3 |
SSH4 |
1.14 ± 0.23 |
0.83 ± 0.21* |
0.7 |
SSH5 |
0.91 ± 0.19 |
0.58 ± 0.17 |
0.6 |
SSH302 |
2.14 ± 0.07 |
0.94 ± 0.09 |
0.4 |
a Mean density in female gametophytes normalized to GAPDH. |
|